Microsoft’s rise to dominance in the generative AI space over the last year has been nothing short of remarkable, but aggressive maneuvers in recent weeks and the penning of several new deals have taken things up a notch.
The company shocked the industry last week when it announced it had poached Inflection AI chief executive Mustafa Suleyman to lead its new consumer-facing AI division.
Not content with whisking away the startup’s CEO, it also took on two other co-founders, a significant portion of staff, and agreed to pay Inflection around $650 million for exclusive rights to sell access to AI models through its Azure cloud service.
The deal is unusual in that Microsoft gained its desired outcome from this situation – the absorption of Inflection talent, IP, and technology – without so much as firing a shot. The deal itself does not constitute a traditional merger or acquisition.
It’s a peculiar setup for Microsoft and Inflection, and one that appears to skirt the boundaries of regulatory scrutiny. Crucially, though, it points toward Microsoft priming itself for a battle to dominate the consumer AI space in the same way it currently does in the enterprise sphere.
“By bringing on a large portion of the Inflection team and licensing its assets, Satya Nadella is not just hedging his bets, but placing a larger one that Microsoft can still win in the consumer space,” Jason Wong, Distinguished VP analyst at Gartner, told ITPro.
This isn’t the only bet Microsoft has taken in recent months either, and Wong’s comments ring true when considering the other moves the firm has made to maintain its position in the AI space.
In February, Microsoft announced a multi-year partnership with European AI startup Mistral that instantly drew suspicion from EU regulators, though no formal investigation has yet been announced.
A key concern initially raised in the wake of this deal centered around the potential for Microsoft to exert control over the company in some capacity.
This control element is an issue that’s already seen the company fall into hot water with regulators over its relationship with OpenAI.
Lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic are currently conducting preliminary investigations into the scope of the tie-up between the two companies, with the UK’s Competitions and Markets Authority (CMA) specifically highlighting concerns over the influence Microsoft has at the startup.
But this campaign at Microsoft is about more than just ensuring it has a finger in every pie. Wong told ITPro this also appears to be an attempt to diversify its AI investments and reduce reliance on OpenAI.
“Microsoft has been trying to shake its perceived dependency on OpenAI, and expand on its AI offerings for consumers,” he said.
OpenAI is by no means a liability, but last year’s chaos in which Sam Altman was ousted certainly created strain and highlighted the precarious nature of the relationship between the two firms. Satya Nadella was said to have been broadsided by the boardroom coup and left “furious” at the situation.
The company also tried to bring Altman on board in a similar role to Suleyman after he’d been forced out of the firm.
Microsoft’s play for Inflection may be a symptom of its lackluster AI offerings
Suleyman’s ascent to CEO of ‘Microsoft AI’ could point toward a degree of insecurity at Microsoft in terms of its positioning in the consumer AI market.
In 2023, Nadella suggested that its generative AI success could be the key to boosting adoption of its Edge browser – a prediction which thus far hasn’t come to fruition. The same can also be said for Bing, with the tech giant still trailing Google in the search space by a significant margin.
According to Wong, the scope of Suleyman’s remit reflects Microsoft’s need to reaffirm and expand on its current suite of products.
“Bringing in Mustafa Suleyman as a CEO for Microsoft AI is a clear sign that there needs to be more vision and accountability to make this happen in the consumer business,” Wong said.
Nadella cited Suleyman’s induction into Microsoft as critical to ensuring it adapts to a rapidly changing product landscape. But Wong suggested this latest move is as much a fear of falling behind as it is a desire to stay ahead.
“Bing Chat has failed to make a material impact, and consumer products centered around Copilot for Windows and Office applications lack the innovation from generative AI that consumers expect,” he said.
