Washington: A special uranium fuel planned for next-generation US nuclear reactors poses security risks because it could be used without further enrichment as fissile material in nuclear weapons, scientists said in an article published recently.
The fuel, called high-assay low-enriched uranium, or HALEU, is enriched to levels of up to 20%, compared with about 5% for the fuel that powers most existing reactors. Until recently it was made in commercial amounts only in Russia, but the United States wants to produce it to fuel a new wave of reactors.
President Joe Biden’s administration believes nuclear power that is virtually emissions-free is essential in the fight against climate change. Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act provided $700 million for a HALEU availability program including purchasing the fuel to create a supply chain for planned high-tech reactors. Uranium is a radioactive element that exists naturally. To make nuclear fuel, raw uranium undergoes processes that result in a material with an increased concentration of the isotope uranium-235.
“This material is directly usable for making nuclear weapons without any further enrichment or reprocessing,” said Scott Kemp, one of five authors of the peer-reviewed article in the journal Science. “In other words, the new reactors pose an unprecedented nuclear-security risk,” said Kemp, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a former science adviser on arms control at the State Department.
A bomb similar in power to the one the U.S. dropped on Hiroshima, Japan in 1945 could be made from 2,200 pounds (1,000 kg) or less of 19.75% enriched HALEU, the article said. “Designing such a weapon would not be without its challenges, but there do not appear to be any convincing reasons why it could not be done,” it said.
The authors said if enrichment is limited to 10% to 12%, the supply chain would be far safer with only modest costs. The authors said HALEU is a domestic risk as it is not required to have the protections normally required for weapons-usable material. U.S. use of the fuel could also set a precedent for other countries building the reactors where proliferation standards are not as strict.
“Were HALEU to become a standard reactor fuel without appropriate restrictions determined by an interagency security review, other countries would be able to obtain, produce, and process weapons-usable HALEU with impunity, eliminating the sharp distinction between peaceful and non-peaceful nuclear programs,” said the article, also written by Edwin Lyman at the Union of Concerned Scientists nonprofit group.
The US Department of Energy estimates that more than 40 metric tonnes of HALEU could be needed before the end of the decade, with additional amounts required each year, to deploy advanced reactors to support the Biden administration’s goal of 100% clean electricity by 2035. The DOE did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
TerraPower, a company backed by Bill Gates that has received funding from the Energy Department, hopes to build its Natrium nuclear plant in Wyoming by 2030 to run on HALEU. TerraPower in late 2022 delayed Natrium’s launch date by at least two years to 2030 due to a lack of HALEU.
A TerraPower spokesperson said Natrium will use HALEU as it allows more efficient energy production and reduces nuclear waste volumes. “TerraPower has made reduction of weapons risks a foundational principle” the spokesperson said, adding that its fuel cycle eliminates the risk of proliferation.
Natrium is expected to start construction on the non-nuclear side but needs federal permits to build the nuclear work. Centrus Energy a U.S. company that has begun making small amounts of HALEU in Ohio and is working with TerraPower to establish commercial production capabilities for the 2030 start, referred questions to the DOE.
